Maybe we can hear from other people about this and see if it is wide-spread.You raise a good point about it perhaps being a performance improvement, which I initially thought as well.

Perhaps what you are seeing as a glitch is really a performance improvement? However, if a lot of people have existing code that uses the no-wait approach, I can see where any change in performance would be a problem. Paddle2See wrote:Thanks for bringing this to our (belated) attention! I'm actually rather surprised that the original script you show (without the wait) worked smoothly in the first place - I would think the changes would be applied so fast that they would appear as one big change from 100 to 0, just like when you are animating a costume by changing costume.